Tuesday, 30 June 2009


This is Bruce's response to the answer given by the legendary Delyth Morgan in answer to Lord Lucas's question, House of Lords Written answers and statements, 29 June 2009.

It is an annotation on the What Do They Know site.

"Jax's point is key - Baroness Drefelin's response is more than disingenuous, it's the Parliamentary equivalent of being 'economical with the truth'.

Moreover, the number of cases to be dealt with by LAs is irrelevant to assessing the magnitude of the impact - you can have a large number of cases but a small impact or a small number of cases but a large impact. The whole point of having the impact assessment is to assess its magnitude; it's poor policy making practice to make an assumption about how small or big it will be, the Govt won't know that until it's done. In addition, Drefelin cant claim the numbers will be small because as the review points out the number of children being home educated is unknown.

The presumption that each case will impose a small burden on LAs also seems naive - possibly indicating a lack of understanding of what might be involved if the proposals are ever to be implemented. For example, the review, itself, calls for trained staff to be involved - this will have a cost and may involve training provision to be commissioned. In addition, I for one will not allow only one LA official to see my daughter on her own - if you can't trust parents then why should I trust the LA staff. A minimum of two staff will be needed (both females so same sex as my daughter), plus I want the interview to be videoed. This will have implications for staffing numbers and other resources.

I had hoped that senior policy makers in DCFS would have realised by now that they had been badly served by a poor quality review. However, it appears that the same lack of thought and understanding underpinning the actual review is being carried forward. "

Jax’s post on this is here

there are seven comments on there at the moment, lets flood them with comments, lets not let her get away with such nonsense.


Carlotta said...

Thank you for putting this up, Maire.

Yet again, I'm finding that the Baroness's pronouncement is proving to be one of those occasions where I am almost lost for words. The errors of thinking/outright lies, whatever you like to call them, are so enormous that it's hard to know where to start.

You make a very measured case under the circumstances, I think.

Maire said...

Thank you Carlotta, it is Bruce's measured case, he knows all abour impact assessments and in 35 years of writing and researching, some of it for the present government has not met the like of this.

Me I am not lost for words but not one of them is printable!

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed